Difference Between Primary Evidence and Secondary Evidence (with Examples and Comparison Chart)

April 2022 · 8 minute read

primary-vs-secondary-evidencePrimary Evidence is considered as the evidence of supreme value, in the eyes of law. On the contrary, Secondary Evidence is non-primary evidence which are used when the primary evidence cannot be produced.

What is Evidence?

Evidence refers to proof of facts or genuine information that reflects the validity or authenticity of a belief or proposition. In the eyes of law, all the documents or statement which are permitted by the Court or made by the witnesses in front of the Court, with respect to the underlying cause, is an Evidence. It can be of two types, i.e. oral evidence and documentary evidence.

Further Documentary Evidences are of two kinds – Primary Evidence and Secondary Evidence

Golden Rule of Law of Evidence

In all the cases, Best Evidence must be provided to the Court.

What is a Document?

When a certain matter is expressed or outlined on any material using letters, figures, marks, or a combination of these, with the intention to use the same for recording that matter. For example Writing, Plan, Inscription, etc.

Section 3, of the Indian Evidences Act, 1872, states that the documents presented for the purpose of inspection to the Court, are Documentary Evidence.

Primary or Secondary Evidence is used to validate the contents of the document.

Content: Primary Evidence Vs Secondary Evidence

  • Comparison Chart
  • Definition
  • Key Differences
  • Example
  • When Secondary Evidence can be produced?
  • Conclusion
  • Comparison Chart

    Basis for ComparisonPrimary EvidenceSecondary Evidence
    MeaningPrimary Evidence is the first and legitimate copy of the document which is produced before the Court for inspection.Secondary Evidence is the substitute but a less important copy of the document, which is produced when the primary evidence is not available.
    Defined inSection 62 of Indian Evidences Act, 1872Section 63 of Indian Evidences Act, 1872
    Nature of SourceOriginal or main sourceAlternative source
    General RuleTo provide primary evidenceException to the general rule
    Prior NoticeNot required to be served to produce it before the CourtMust be served to produce it before the Court
    AdmissibilityThe evidence is by itself admissible to the Court.The evidence is admissible only if the primary evidence is not present.

    Definition of Primary Evidence

    Primary Evidence, as the name suggests, refers to the documents in their authentic or standard form presented before the Court for the purpose of inspection, to check its validity.

    It relies on the notion of Best Evidence. As per the notion, the document must be produced in front of the court in its original form, because then only the document is unmediated and highly reliable. It is considered the most reliable copy because it is free from any tampering, addition, or omission.

    Primary Evidence includes:primary-evidence

    Also Read: Difference Between Confession and Admission

    Definition of Secondary Evidence

    Secondary Evidence is also proof of facts like primary evidence but is comparatively less important in nature.

    These are provided in certain cases when the primary evidence is not present or cannot be produced before the Court in certain circumstances. This means that Secondary Evidence is the evidence presented as an alternative to the primary evidence, as stated in Section 65 of the Indian Evidences Act, 1872.

    Secondary Evidence includes:secondary-evidence

    What all is covered in secondary evidence?

    It covers certified copies, copies made using a mechanical process, counterfoil of cheque or another document, photograph, photocopy, tape records, duplicates, unprobated will, age certificate, voter list, newspaper report, oral accounts, etc.

    Also Read: Difference Between Detention and Arrest

    Key Differences Between Primary and Secondary Evidence

    As of now, we have completely understood the concept of these two. Now, we will move further to discuss the difference between Primary and Secondary Evidence:

  • Primary Evidence implies the first-hand and most reliable copy of the document which is presented to the court for the purpose of inspection. Conversely, secondary evidence is less relevant evidence in comparison to Primary Evidence, which is used only when the primary evidence is unavailable for proof.
  • Section 62 of the Indian Evidences Act, 1872 deals with primary evidence, whereas Section 63 of the Indian Evidences Act, 1872 deals with secondary evidence.
  • The general rule is to provide the primary evidence to the court, whereas the provision of secondary evidence to the court is the exception to the general rule, permissible only in special circumstances, discussed in Section 65 of the Act.
  • No prior notice is required to be served for producing primary evidence to the court. However, prior notice is required to be served for producing secondary evidence, for which rules are prescribed under Section 66, of the Act.
  • When it comes to the source of evidence, primary evidence is the fundamental or original source while secondary evidence is the alternative source.
  • While primary evidence is by itself acceptable to the court, secondary evidence is acceptable only when primary evidence is non-existent, unavailable, or cannot be provided.
  • Example

    Suppose you go to a Photo Studio to get passport size photographs. All the copies received by you, in that case, acts as primary evidence as each photograph goes through the same mechanical process, whereas if you go to a studio to get the copy of a photograph clicked previously, then this will amount to secondary evidence.

    When Secondary Evidence can be produced?

    There are certain circumstances in which secondary evidence can be produced in place of primary evidence, provided certain conditions are satisfied:

    Also Read: Difference Between Complaint and FIR

    Conclusion

    Obviously, on comparing the two, primary evidence will always have an upper hand over secondary evidence. In fact, the presentation of secondary evidence will only be admissible in case of non-availability of the primary evidence at the first place.

    ncG1vNJzZmijla6xqrLFnqmeppOawG%2BvzqZmnaGWm7Kzsc2cnGaalanEprHNZqeroZ2Wv7p5xK%2BgnZ2emLJurc2dZKydk6S7pa3RsmSerpmZsq%2BvxGefraWc